Un SuperJet-100 sufre accidente durante un vuelo de certificación en Islandia

Gerardo Rocha

Well-Known Member
Ops.

Del dia de hoy.

An Armavia Sukhoi Superjet 100-95, registration 95005 performing test flight 97007 from Keflavik to Keflavik (Iceland) with 5 crew on board, was performing cross wind landing tests on Keflavik's runway 11, when the aircraft landed on its belly at 05:26L (05:26Z) with all gear up and slid off the runway. One crew member received injuries and needed to be taken to hospital, the aircraft received substantial damage.

Authorities in Iceland do not rule out a technical problem or human error as cause of the accident. Iceland's RNF have opened an investigation into the accident.





http://avherald.com/h?article=465ade78&opt=0

Un muy accidentado inicio del SSJ100, pero era de esperarse, no tiene absolutamente nada que ver que sea ruso, de todos modos hay muchisima tecnologia y fabricantes occidentales detras de este gran proyecto.

Mucha suerte a Interjet con este nuevo avion!

Saludos.
 

Antonio Espinosa

Administrator
Comunicado oficial de Shukoi
Aviation Incident with Sukhoi Superjet 100 during Test Flights on Expanding Operational Conditions/21.07.2013

Today, July 21, 2013, at 05.25 local time at Keflavik International Airport (Reykjavik, Iceland) an aviation incident with Sukhoi Superjet 100 tail number 97005 took place.
At the final stage of test flights to evaluate Sukhoi Superjet 100 performance of automatic landing system to execute CAT III A with strong crosswind conditions as part of additional certification trials on expanding operational conditions as well as imitation of landing with one engine failure the aircraft has touched the runway with retracted landing gear.
There were five people on board: three crew members, two certification center experts. No victims as a result of the incident occurred. One of the experts damaged his leg during evacuation procedures.
At the time of the incident all aircraft systems were functioning normally. Based on SCAC preliminary estimation the aircraft will be restored and returned back to test flights program.

The Sukhoi Superjet 100 (SSJ100) is the regional 100-seater aircraft of the new generation developed and manufactured by JSC Sukhoi Civil Aircraft with the participation of Alenia Aermacchi. On May 19, 2008, the SSJ100 made its first flight. The maximum cruising speed of the Sukhoi Superjet 100 is 0.81 Mach, and the cruising altitude is 12,200 m (40,000 feet). The length of the take-off strip for the base version of the aircraft is 1,731 m, for the version with the increased flight range – 2,052 m. The flight range for the base version is 3,048 km, for the version with the increased flight range – 4,578 km.
Sukhoi Civil Aircraft Company
The shareholders of Sukhoi Civil Aircraft are JSC “Sukhoi” (75% – 1 share) (a UAC Company) and, as of April 7, 2009, its strategic partner – the Italian company of Alenia Aermacchi (25% + 1 share). The Sukhoi Civil Aircraft (SCA) company was founded in 2000 in order to create new models of aircraft designed for civil purposes. The head office of the company is located in Moscow. SCA also has branches on the main production sites in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, Novosibirsk and Voronezh. At the present time, the company’s main project is the implementation of the programme for creating the family of the Russian Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft.
 

MIG

Moderator



Un avión ruso SuperJet-100 sufrió hoy un accidente en el aeropuerto islandés de Keflavik durante un vuelo de certificación, informó el fabricante de la nave, la empresa Aviones Civiles de Sukhoi.
Según un comunicado de la compañía, el accidente tuvo lugar durante la fase final de la prueba de certificación, consistente en el simulacro de aterrizaje con un motor averiado y viento transversal, el avión tocó la pista con el tren aterrizaje plegado.
Las cinco personas, tres tripulantes y dos expertos que viajaban a bordo del avión resultaron ilesas.
 

kpax_32

New Member
Si hay algo rescatable de esta noticia es el hecho de que sucedió en un vuelo de prueba, para eso son, para llevar al máximo la aeronave y conocer sus limites, y si se encuentra algo anormal tratar de mitigarlo lo antes posible para que no vuelva a suceder y llegase a afectar a los aviones comerciales que ya estan operando, no dudo que Sukhoi y Alenia al final tendrán un muy buen avión.
 

Phillip J fry

Well-Known Member
En avherald, se habla de que pudierom haber quitado alguna alarma del tren, por el tipo de pruebas, y que panzearon el avion por error de pilotos.... Pero es muy temprano para los resultados.

2 accidentes serios ahora para el sukhoi......

Esperemos que haya sigo error de pilotaje por el bien del proyecto.....

Rob
 

GP7200

New Member
¿Habrán olvidado bajar el tren? y sin alarma no supieron hasta que tocaron tierra. Tan bonito avión y en pruebas le dan con todo contra la pista. Esperemos los reportes finales y ojalá ya pronto esté volando con Interjet.
 

isr747

New Member
Al menos ya podemos saber que si aguanta muy bien los golpes y panzasos. Solo hay que tomar en cuanta algo...Si fuera panzaso, no seria un error del avión, si no del piloto. Por lo tanto no es falla de aeronave, si no error.

Sin embargo hay que esperar a ver que sucede.
 

Capi Diaz

Active Member
Nadie esta excento de tener un accidente/incidente, pero que pasa con la capacitacion de los pilotosoficiales de sukkoi que llevan dos aviones.....
 

Dreamflyer

New Member
Nada que errar es humano. En la aviación los errores cuestan vidas.

Alguien aquí en el foro tenía como firma: "Read the f***ing checklist".
Otro muy sabio "Con velocidad y altura conservas la dentadura".

A lo mejor y como medida precautoria, posiblemente en los Shukoi de Interjet van a ofrecer como amenidad, frasquitos de árnica.
 

Moy206

Well-Known Member
Y aun asi... La alarma de "too low gear" o algo asi.. Me imagino q debe tener no? A lo mejor de tantaa carga de tabajo tampoco la escucharon... Asi como la visioon de tunel..
Q han de haber sentido al ver bajar el tren asii como si nada... :s
 

pandita_lax

Member
Y aun asi... La alarma de "too low gear" o algo asi.. Me imagino q debe tener no? A lo mejor de tantaa carga de tabajo tampoco la escucharon... Asi como la visioon de tunel..
Q han de haber sentido al ver bajar el tren asii como si nada... :s
Dicen que como eran pruebas posiblemente volvieron a desactivar esos sistemas al igual que en el primer accidente, por que creeme una alarma de esas no pasa por desapercibida.
 

XA-NIT

Administrator
Q han de haber sentido al ver bajar el tren asii como si nada... :s
Lo mismo me pregunté cuando vi el video. Que cosas pasan.
Y lo de la alarma como dice pandita, lo más seguro es que hayan desactivado los sistemas.

En fin, parece que si reconstruirán el avión y no será perdida total.




Saludos...!
 

Guajolojet

Well-Known Member
Lo mismo me pregunté cuando vi el video. Que cosas pasan.
Y lo de la alarma como dice pandita, lo más seguro es que hayan desactivado los sistemas.

En fin, parece que si reconstruirán el avión y no será perdida total.




Saludos...!
deberian de vendérselo a interjet para partes refacciones
 

CapAlbert

New Member
Con tantos vídeos en You Tube de "Russian Crash Compilation", yo ya estoy pensando que a lo mejor así como manejan los rusos, igual vuelan, como que da la impresión que no son muy disciplinados o tal vez "too much Vodka"
 

phantom21

Member
Buenos dias, aqui los primeros resultados de las investigaciones del incidente del Sukhoi en Islandia.



Investigators have determined that the undercarriage of a Sukhoi Superjet 100 was deployed, but then retracted, before the aircraft suffered a gear-up accident at Keflavik airport.
Icelandic authority RNF has yet to explain why the aircraft failed to climb away after carrying out a missed approach at low altitude. It lost height instead and struck the runway.
The twinjet's crew had been intending to perform the missed approach, under single-engine conditions, as part of a certification programme for Category IIIa landings.
Icelandic investigation authority RNF says the aircraft was "close" to its maximum operating weight and flying in crosswinds as it performed the approach to Keflavik's runway 11 on 21 July.
The purpose of the exercise was to conduct a "low pass", it adds.
As the Superjet made its approach, and during the low pass, the landing-gear was extended, says the inquiry. The aircraft then executed a missed approach procedure and the landing-gear was retracted.
But the Superjet then descended towards the runway and made contact with the landing-gear still raised.
It skidded along runway 11 and came to a halt off the far end, resting on the pods of its PowerJet SaM146 engines.
Sukhoi says the aircraft was performing "touch-and-go procedures imitating missed approach".
"According to the previously-approved plan of trials, when the aircraft [was] climbing its landing-gear had to be retracted," it states. "The crew followed this procedure."
Video images of the aircraft being recovered - using cranes and inflatable lifting supports beneath the wings - show the landing-gear being extended without any obvious problem.
The apparent serviceability of the undercarriage is likely to turn the focus of the inquiry to the aircraft's airspeed and thrust settings.
Surveillance tracks indicate that the aircraft had performed some 40 approaches to runways 11 and 20 overnight before the accident at 05:23.
Russia's Interstate Aviation Committee is to assist the Icelandic authority in the investigation.


Fuente - http://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...failed-to-climb-after-missed-approach-388828/



 
Última edición:

kpax_32

New Member
Buenos dias, aqui los primeros resultados de las investigaciones del incidente del Sukhoi en Islandia.



Investigators have determined that the undercarriage of a Sukhoi Superjet 100 was deployed, but then retracted, before the aircraft suffered a gear-up accident at Keflavik airport.
Icelandic authority RNF has yet to explain why the aircraft failed to climb away after carrying out a missed approach at low altitude. It lost height instead and struck the runway.
The twinjet's crew had been intending to perform the missed approach, under single-engine conditions, as part of a certification programme for Category IIIa landings.
Icelandic investigation authority RNF says the aircraft was "close" to its maximum operating weight and flying in crosswinds as it performed the approach to Keflavik's runway 11 on 21 July.
The purpose of the exercise was to conduct a "low pass", it adds.
As the Superjet made its approach, and during the low pass, the landing-gear was extended, says the inquiry. The aircraft then executed a missed approach procedure and the landing-gear was retracted.
But the Superjet then descended towards the runway and made contact with the landing-gear still raised.
It skidded along runway 11 and came to a halt off the far end, resting on the pods of its PowerJet SaM146 engines.
Sukhoi says the aircraft was performing "touch-and-go procedures imitating missed approach".
"According to the previously-approved plan of trials, when the aircraft [was] climbing its landing-gear had to be retracted," it states. "The crew followed this procedure."
Video images of the aircraft being recovered - using cranes and inflatable lifting supports beneath the wings - show the landing-gear being extended without any obvious problem.
The apparent serviceability of the undercarriage is likely to turn the focus of the inquiry to the aircraft's airspeed and thrust settings.
Surveillance tracks indicate that the aircraft had performed some 40 approaches to runways 11 and 20 overnight before the accident at 05:23.
Russia's Interstate Aviation Committee is to assist the Icelandic authority in the investigation.


Fuente - http://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...failed-to-climb-after-missed-approach-388828/



Pues esto me suena a que el accidente es a un error que trae de programación el sistema de vuelo electrónico del avión, desgraciadamente a Sukhoi le ha costado caro la curva de aprendizaje de un avión moderno.
 
Arriba