Trivia fotográfica FSMEX
- Iniciador del tema Cougar222
- Fecha de inicio
Phillip J fry
Well-Known Member
Que tal
Hola
Ha ojo de buen cubero, creo que es un WESTWIND o un JET COMMANDER que creo que es lo mismo o casi lo mismo, pero el mismo desing.
Un avion similar fue el XC COL que cayo hace unos con el gobernador de colima, fallecieron todos sus ocupantes.
Saludos
Hola
Ha ojo de buen cubero, creo que es un WESTWIND o un JET COMMANDER que creo que es lo mismo o casi lo mismo, pero el mismo desing.
Un avion similar fue el XC COL que cayo hace unos con el gobernador de colima, fallecieron todos sus ocupantes.
Saludos
Cap. Macias
New Member
Bueno bueno... pues al parecer nadie va a decirnos cual fue el avion anterior.
Aqui esta una nueva trivia de un avionsillo que me encontre por ahi. El que la adivine ganara un premio. Espero sigan la dinamica... o que...les da frio?
Saludos!
Aqui esta una nueva trivia de un avionsillo que me encontre por ahi. El que la adivine ganara un premio. Espero sigan la dinamica... o que...les da frio?
Saludos!
Cap. Macias
New Member
Cooorrecto FREDDO...
The AD-1's oblique wing could be rotated on its center pivot so that it could be set at its most efficient angle for the speed at which it was flying. A rather innovative swing wing that doesn't have the moving center of lift problem found in conventional designs. Computers would've had to control aeleron deflection, though, to prevent yaw and roll moments. How 'bout we call it 'Shear'? 'Scissor'?
First Flight: 21 December 1979
pense q minimo iba a durar un poco mas sin adivinar jajaja.
¿Que te has ganado? Pues ganaste la oportunidad de subir ahora tu una foto a la trivia, pero pues a ver quien mas se anima...
jajaja SALUDOS!
The AD-1's oblique wing could be rotated on its center pivot so that it could be set at its most efficient angle for the speed at which it was flying. A rather innovative swing wing that doesn't have the moving center of lift problem found in conventional designs. Computers would've had to control aeleron deflection, though, to prevent yaw and roll moments. How 'bout we call it 'Shear'? 'Scissor'?
First Flight: 21 December 1979
pense q minimo iba a durar un poco mas sin adivinar jajaja.
¿Que te has ganado? Pues ganaste la oportunidad de subir ahora tu una foto a la trivia, pero pues a ver quien mas se anima...
jajaja SALUDOS!
_magn_
Member
Ayers LM200 Loadmasterfmgarza dijo:
In 1996, urged on by Federal Express, development was begun on the Ayres LM200 Loadmaster, designed to carry four demi containers. The aircraft was to be powered by two 1350hp LHTEC TP800 driving a single five-bladed Hamilton-Standard propeller through a combining gearbox. To support this development effort, Ayres acquired the LET aircraft manufacturing company in the Czech Republic in September 1998. In 2001, the company was forced into bankruptcy when creditors foreclosed on it and the Loadmaster program was terminated.
Type:......................................Multi-role Light Transport
ACCOMODATION:
[Cargo]...................................7,500 lbs over 600 nautical miles or 6,000 lbs over 1,000 miles. The version for Federal Express was to carry four (4) 1,200 lb containers
[Passengers]............................19 passengers plus cargo, 32 passengers in high-density seating or 29 paratroops
VARIANTS:
(1) Standard Cargo
(2) Cargo/Passenger
(3) Passenger
(4) Paratroop
(5) Reconnaisance
***(It can also be configured with amphibian pontoons)***
DIMENSIONS:
[Wingspan]..............................19.5 m
[Length]..................................21.03 m
[Height]...................................6.86 m
[Cabin Height]...........................2.39 m
[Maximum Cabin Width]...............2.53 m
[Main Cargo Volume (Flat Floor)]....38.23 m3 (1350 ft3)
WEIGHTS:
[Empty].................................4082 kg
[Maximum Payload]...................3946 kg
[Maximum Fuel]........................1823 kg (600 gallons)
[Maximum Take-Off Weight].......8618 kg
POWERPLANT:
One (1) Allied Signal/Allison CTP800-4T {two (2) CTP800 turboshaft engines with GKN Westland-developed combining gearbox driving a single (1) 13-foot diameter 4-blade Hamilton Standard propeller.}
PERFORMANCE:
[Max Cruising Speed].....363 km/h (196 KTAS) @ 10,000 feet
Normal Cruising Speed....305 km/h (165 KTAS) @ 10,000 feet
Eco-Romeo-Lima
New Member
Esta pregunta se quedò ya hace mucho !!XA-CMF dijo:A ver, hace mucho que no aporto algo... aqui esta este... el que esta en primer plano!
Bristol 167 Bravazon
This was a huge airliner built by the Bristol Aeroplane Company in 1949 to fly a large number of passengers on transatlantic routes from England to the United States. The plane was delivered in 1949, only to prove a complete commercial failure when airlines felt the plane was too large and expensive to be useful. Although sized larger than a Boeing 747, it carried only 60 to 80 passengers.
Specifications
Passengers: 50-180
Engines: 8 x Bristol Centaurus, 1864kW (2,650 hp)
Wingspan: 70.1m 230 ft
Length: 53.95m 177 ft
Height: 15.24m 50 ft
Wing area: 493.95m² 5,317 sq ft
empty weight: 65816kg 145,100 lb
takeoff weight: 131542kg 290,000 lb
Max speed: 483kph, cruise speed: 402kph
Ceiling: 7620m
Range: 8850km 5,500 miles
Eco-Romeo-Lima
New Member
A ver si alguien sabe que es esto, chance helipilot
MIG
Moderator
Eco-Romeo-Lima dijo:A ver si alguien sabe que es esto, chance helipilot
Sikorsky S-69 XH-59A
In February 1972, Sikorsky announced the development of an experimental helicopter designated S-69, which was designed to study the Advancing Blade Concept (ABC). This new system consisted of two rigid, contra-rotating rotors which made use of the aerodynamic lift of the advancing blades. At high speeds, the retreating blades were offloaded, as most of the load was supported by the advancing blades of both rotors and the penalty due to stall of the retreating blade was thus eliminated. This system did not even require a wing to be fitted for high speeds and to improve manoeuvrability, and also eliminated the need for an anti-torque rotor at the tail.
B
bridwellisland
Guest
MIL MI 12capmcfly dijo:
A ver que es estoooo :0?[/img]